Documentation

← Back

Alternatives and comparison.

ScaleSocket vs. websocketd

ScaleSocket is intended to be a drop-in replacement for websocketd. It supports many of the same features, but allows websocket connections to share a single backend process.

ScaleSocket has first-class support for rooms, and allows routing messages to specific clients.

Additionally ScaleSocket exposes APIs for fetching room metadata and metrics, which are useful for building lobbies and monitoring.

ScaleSocket vs. Socket.io

ScaleSocket can be used as a replacement for Socket.io in some cases. It supports some of the same features, such as rooms and message routing.

The difference lies in how they are integrated with the backend code. Socket.io is a (frontend and) backend library. It requires the backend to handle connections and room logic.

ScaleSocket is a command line tool that wraps the backend without modifying its code. It abstracts away WebSocket connections and room management from the backend implementation.

Other alternatives

A comparison of tools offering similar functionality. The table highlights which tools support bidirectional communication with a shared backend instance.

Application Language Spawn Technology Channels Bidirectional connection Shared backend Use case
ScaleSocket rust processes stdio, tcp bidirectional websocket server
plane rust docker http, ws bidirectional websocket server
websocketd go processes stdio bidirectional websocket server
websocat rust processes stdio, tcp all-round tool
gwsocket c stdio, pipes bidirectional websocket stream
wsbroad rust websocket broadcaster
websockify various processes tcp websocket to TCP proxy
agones go kubernetes tcp, udp gameserver scaler
FastCGI c processes stdio dynamic websites in 2000's
inetd c processes stdio dynamic websites in 1990's

Also some servers, such as NGINX and Caddy support spawning processes and CGI with plugins.

Next.